United States Patent Application |
20150097714
|
Kind Code
|
A1
|
Margolin; Jed
|
April 9, 2015
|
ADS-B Radar
Abstract
The reliability and safety of Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast
(ADS-B) are improved by using the signals transmitted from an ADS-B unit
as a radar transmitter with a receiver used to receive reflections.
Inventors: |
Margolin; Jed; (VC Highlands, NV)
|
Applicant: | Name | City | State | Country | Type | Margolin; Jed | VC Highlands | NV | US
| | |
Family ID:
|
1000000584156
|
Appl. No.:
|
14/146202
|
Filed:
|
January 2, 2014 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| | | | | | |
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number |
---|
| 61887338 | Oct 5, 2013 | |
|
Current U.S. Class: |
342/29 |
Current CPC Class: |
G01S 13/9303 20130101 |
Class at Publication: |
342/29 |
International Class: |
G01S 13/93 20060101 G01S013/93 |
Claims
1. A system for sensing aircraft and other objects comprising: (a) an
ADS-B transmitter; (b) an ADS-B receiver; (c) an ADS-B antenna; (d) an
ADS-B antenna multiplexer; (e) an ADS-B processor; (f) a radar processor;
(g) a datastream comparator; (h) a display; whereby (i) said ADS-B
processor is configured to control said ADS-B antenna multiplexer, and
said ADS-B multiplexer is configured to allow either said ADS-B
transmitter or said ADS-B receiver to use said ADS-B antenna, (j) said
ADS-B processor and said radar processor are configured to work together,
(k) said ADS-B processor is configured to periodically cause said ADS-B
transmitter to emit a transmitted signal through said ADS-B antenna
multiplexer to said ADS-B antenna, (l) said transmitted signal is
reflected by a target producing a reflected signal, (m) said reflected
signal is received by said ADS-B antenna, and said ADS-B antenna
multiplexer is configured to send said reflected signal to said ADS-B
receiver, (n) said radar processor is configured to process said
reflected signal from said ADS-B receiver and said transmitted signal
from said ADS-B transmitter to determine a range to said target, (o) said
datastream comparator is configured to compare the datastream of said
transmitted signal and the datastream from said reflected signal, and (p)
said radar processor is configured to display said range on said display.
2. The system of claim 1 whereby (a) if said range to said target does
not match a possible position of said target as reported by ADS-B
messages from said target said radar processor is configured to note this
on said display as a first attention item, (b) said radar processor is
configured to use the change in the positions of said target as reported
by said ADS-B messages received from said target to calculate a reported
radial velocity of said target, (c) said radar processor is configured to
use the Doppler shift of said reflected signal to calculate a measured
radial velocity of said target, (d) a discrepancy between said reported
radial velocity of said target and said measured radial velocity of said
target indicates a system error comprising GPS spoofing, failure of the
ADS-B system on said target, or deliberate misreporting by said target
and said radar processor is configured to note said discrepancy on said
display as a second attention item, and (e) a receipt of said ADS-B
messages from said target that is not confirmed by a reflected signal
indicates that a false ADS-B signal is being broadcast and said radar
processor is configured to note said false ADS-B signal on said display
as a third attention item.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein said datastream comparator is
incorporated into said radar processor.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein said radar processor is incorporated
into said ADS-B processor.
5. A system for sensing aircraft and other objects comprising: (a) an
ADS-B transmitter; (b) an ADS-B receiver; (c) a first ADS-B antenna; (d)
a second ADS-B antenna; (e) an antenna controller; (f) an ADS-B antenna
multiplexer; (g) an ADS-B processor; (h) a radar processor; (i) a
datastream comparator; (j) a display; whereby (k) said second ADS-B
antenna is directional, and said radar processor is configured to control
said antenna controller which is configured to control the direction of
said second ADS-B antenna, (l) said ADS-B processor is configured to
control said ADS-B antenna multiplexer, and said ADS-B antenna
multiplexer is configured to allow said ADS-B transmitter to use either
said first ADS-B antenna or said second ADS-B antenna, and said ADS-B
antenna multiplexer is also configured to allow said ADS-B receiver to
use either said first ADS-B antenna or said second ADS-B antenna, (m)
said ADS-B processor and said radar processor are configured to work
together, (n) said ADS-B processor is configured to periodically cause
said ADS-B transmitter to emit a transmitted signal through either said
first ADS-B antenna or said second ADS-B antenna through said ADS-B
antenna multiplexer, (o) said transmitted signal is reflected by a target
producing a reflected signal, (p) said reflected signal is received by
either or both said first ADS-B antenna and said second ADS-B antenna,
and said ADS-B antenna multiplexer is configured to select either said
first ADS-B antenna or said second ADS-B antenna and send said reflected
signal to said ADS-B receiver, (q) said radar processor is configured to
process said reflected signal from said ADS-B receiver and said
transmitted signal from said ADS-B transmitter to determine a range to
said target, (r) said radar processor is configured to use the direction
of said second ADS-B antenna to determine a bearing to said target, (s)
said datastream comparator is configured to compare the datastream of
said transmitted signal and the datastream from said reflected signal,
and (t) said radar processor is configured to display said range and said
bearing on said display.
6. The system of claim 5 whereby (a) if said range and said bearing to
said target do not match the position of said target as reported by ADS-B
messages from said target said radar processor is configured to note this
on said display as a first attention item, (b) said radar processor is
configured to use the change in the positions of said target as reported
by said ADS-B messages received from said target to calculate a reported
radial velocity of said target, (c) said radar processor is configured to
use the Doppler shift of said reflected signal to calculate a measured
radial velocity of said target, (d) a discrepancy between said reported
radial velocity of said target and said measured radial velocity of said
target indicates a system error comprising GPS spoofing, failure of the
ADS-B system on said target, or deliberate misreporting by said target,
and said radar processor is configured to note said discrepancy on said
display as a second attention item, and (e) a receipt of said ADS-B
messages from said target that is not confirmed by a reflected signal
indicates that a false ADS-B signal is being broadcast and said radar
processor is configured to note said false ADS-B signal on said display
as a third attention item.
7. The system of claim 5 wherein said datastream comparator is
incorporated into said radar processor.
8. The system of claim 5 wherein said radar processor is incorporated
into said ADS-B processor.
9. The system of claim 5 wherein said second ADS-B antenna and said
antenna controller comprise a mechanically aimed antenna.
10. The system of claim 5 wherein said second ADS-B antenna and said
antenna controller comprise an active electronically scanned antenna
array.
11. The system of claim 6 wherein said second ADS-B antenna and said
antenna controller comprise a mechanically aimed antenna.
12. The system of claim 6 wherein said second ADS-B antenna and said
antenna controller comprise an active electronically scanned antenna
array.
13. A system for sensing aircraft and other objects comprising: (a) an
ADS-B transmitter; (b) a first ADS-B receiver; (c) a first ADS-B antenna;
(d) a second ADS-B receiver; (e) a second ADS-B antenna; (f) an antenna
controller; (g) an ADS-B antenna multiplexer; (h) an ADS-B processor; (i)
a radar processor; (j) a datastream comparator; (k) a display; whereby
(l) said second ADS-B antenna is directional and said radar processor is
configured to control said antenna controller which is configured to
control the direction of said second ADS-B antenna, (m) said ADS-B
processor is configured to control said ADS-B antenna multiplexer, and
said ADS-B antenna multiplexer is configured to allow said ADS-B
transmitter to use either said first ADS-B antenna or said second ADS-B
antenna, and said ADS-B antenna multiplexer is also configured to allow
said first ADS-B receiver to use either said first ADS-B antenna or said
second ADS-B antenna, and said ADS-B antenna multiplexer is also
configured to allow said second ADS-B receiver to use either said first
ADS-B antenna or said second ADS-B antenna, (n) said ADS-B processor and
said radar processor work together, (o) said ADS-B processor is
configured to periodically cause said ADS-B transmitter to emit a
transmitted signal through either said first ADS-B antenna or said second
ADS-B antenna through said ADS-B antenna multiplexer, (p) said
transmitted signal is reflected by a target producing a reflected signal,
(q) said reflected signal is received by either or both said first ADS-B
antenna or said second ADS-B antenna, and said ADS-B multiplexer is
configured to select either said first ADS-B antenna or said second ADS-B
antenna and send said reflected signal to said second ADS-B receiver, (r)
said radar processor is configured to process said reflected signal from
said second ADS-B receiver and said transmitted signal from said ADS-B
transmitter to determine a range to said target, (s) said radar processor
is configured to use the direction of said second antenna to determine a
bearing to said target, (t) said datastream comparator is configured to
compare the datastream of said transmitted signal and the datastream from
said reflected signal, and (u) said radar processor is configured to
display said range and said bearing on said display.
14. The system of claim 13 whereby (a) if said range and said bearing to
said target do not match the position of said target as reported by ADS-B
messages from said target said radar processor is configured to note this
on said display as a first attention item, (b) said radar processor is
configured to use the change in the positions of said target as reported
by said ADS-B messages received from said target to calculate a reported
radial velocity of said target, (c) said radar processor is configured to
use the Doppler shift of said reflected signal to calculate a measured
radial velocity of said target, (d) a discrepancy between said reported
radial velocity of said target and said measured radial velocity of said
target indicates a system error comprising GPS spoofing, failure of the
ADS-B system on said target, or deliberate misreporting by said target,
and said radar processor is configured to note said discrepancy on said
display as a second attention item, and (e) a receipt of said ADS-B
messages from said target that is not confirmed by a reflected signal
indicates that a false ADS-B signal is being broadcast and said radar
processor is configured to note said false ADS-B signal on said display
as a third attention item.
15. The system of claim 13 wherein said datastream comparator is
incorporated into said radar processor.
16. The system of claim 13 wherein said radar processor is incorporated
into said ADS-B processor.
17. The system of claim 13 wherein said second ADS-B antenna and said
antenna controller comprise a mechanically aimed antenna.
18. The system of claim 13 wherein said second ADS-B antenna and said
antenna controller comprise an active electronically scanned antenna
array.
19. The system of claim 14 wherein said second ADS-B antenna and said
antenna controller comprise a mechanically aimed antenna.
20. The system of claim 14 wherein said second ADS-B antenna and said
antenna controller comprise an active electronically scanned antenna
array.
Description
CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application
No. 61/887,338 filed on Oct. 5, 2013. The present invention is an
improvement on U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/594,815 (Publication
2013/0176163) System for sensing aircraft and other objects by the
present inventor and is hereby incorporated by reference herein. [IDS
Cite 1]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] 1. Field of Invention
[0003] This invention relates to the field of sensing aircraft and other
objects and is part of the See and Avoid (SAA) function for manned
aircraft and the Detect, Sense and Avoid (DSA) function for remotely
piloted vehicles (RPVs) and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). RPV is an
older term for UAV. Drone is another older term for UAV. "UCAV" shall
mean "Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle." UCAV is also sometimes defined as
an "Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicle." UCAV is a UAV that is intended
for use in combat. UAS means "Unmanned Aerial System." UCAS means
"Unmanned Combat Air System." The characteristics all these vehicles have
in common is that there is no human pilot onboard, and although they may
be operated autonomously they can also be controlled by a remotely
located operator or pilot. The term UAV shall be used as a generic term
for such vehicles. Detect, Sense, and Avoid (DSA) is also commonly called
Sense and Avoid (SAA) since "Detect" and "Sense" mostly mean the same
thing. This invention is directed to the "See" in "See and Avoid" and the
"Sense" in "Sense and Avoid." Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast
(ADS-B) is the system by which an aircraft periodically transmits a
message comprising its identification, location, altitude, and heading.
The term "datastream" means the stream of data comprising the ADS-B
message. The term "bitstream" means the same as "datastream."
[0004] 2. Prior Art
[0005] In an aircraft with the pilot onboard, Sense and Avoid is called
See and Avoid. FAA Regulations do not give much guidance for seeing other
aircraft. [0006] Right-of-way rules: Except water operations 14 CFR
.sctn.91.113(b) [IDS Cite 2]: [0007] (b) General. When weather
conditions permit, regardless of whether an operation is conducted under
instrument flight rules or visual flight rules, vigilance shall be
maintained by each person operating an aircraft so as to see and avoid
other aircraft. When a rule of this section gives another aircraft the
right-of-way, the pilot shall give way to that aircraft and may not pass
over, under, or ahead of it unless well clear. [0008] Right-of-way
rules: Water operations 14 CFR .sctn.91.115(a) [IDS Cite 3] [0009] (a)
General. Each person operating an aircraft on the water shall, insofar as
possible, keep clear of all vessels and avoid impeding their navigation,
and shall give way to any vessel or other aircraft that is given the
right-of-way by any rule of this section. When operating under Visual
Flight Rules the idea is to look out small windows providing a limited
field of view and hope you see any nearby aircraft in time to avoid a
collision. This is made more difficult because of the wide range of
aircraft sizes and speeds. (Is it a large aircraft far away or a small
aircraft much closer?) This is even more difficult under instrument
flight rules where there may be no visibility.
[0010] UAVs have special problems sensing other aircraft. [0011] 1. If
the UAV is flown manually by a remote pilot looking at the video produced
by a camera mounted in the nose of the aircraft the field of view will be
too limited to see other aircraft other than those directly ahead. [0012]
2. If the UAV is flown autonomously there is no human pilot. If the
flight is supervised by a human operator the problem remains that the
field of view from a camera mounted in the nose of the aircraft will be
too limited.
[0013] A system by which an aircraft periodically transmits its
identification, location, altitude, and heading is taught by U.S. Pat.
No. 5,153,836 Universal dynamic navigation, surveillance, emergency
location, and collision avoidance system and method issued Oct. 10, 1992
to Fraughton et al. [IDS Cite 4] and was materially adopted by the FAA as
Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B). According to the
article Gulf of Mexico Helo Ops Ready for ADS-B in Aviation Week & Space
Technology (Feb. 26, 2007, page 56) [IDS Cite 5]: [0014] By the end of
2010, FAA expects to have the ADS-B system tested and operationally
acceptable for the NAS, with Houston Center providing services in the
Gulf region. By 2013, all of the U.S. is scheduled to be covered with
ground infrastructure.
[0015] The ADS-B system is used as a radar in U.S. Pat. No. 7,414,567
ADS-B radar system issued Aug. 19, 2008 to Zhang et al. [IDS Cite 6]
Zhang modifies the standard ADS-B equipment by providing for random phase
modulation that is added to a standard ADS-B waveform utilizing it as a
primary radar signal. Phase coherent radio-frequency electronics are used
for modulations and de-modulations and the phase modulator can be
inserted bit by bit at a 180 degree phase shift per bit change. (See
Column 3, lines 49-64)
[0016] One of Zhan's reasons for introducing random phase modulation is to
raise the transmit spectrum sidelobes. (See Column 8, lines 23-27).
[0017] The reason why raising the transmit spectrum sidelobes is desirable
appears to be because (1) raising the peaks in the transmit spectrum will
increase the peaks in the spectrum of a reflected target signal and (2)
the peaks in the spectrum of the reflected signal are used to compute the
angles-of-arrival of the reflected target signal, i.e. the target. (See
Column 7, lines 10-26)
[0018] Note that determining the angles-of-arrival of a signal cannot be
done with a single omnidirectional antenna. It requires more than one
antenna. Indeed, Zahn uses two antenna arrays, i.e two arrays of
antennas. See Column 6, lines 39-45: [0019] Referring again to FIG. 1,
antenna system 50 includes a plurality of antennas, which, in the
embodiment shown, include a top circular array antenna 51, and a bottom
circular array antenna 52. The arrays include individual elements 53
(FIG. 4). Circular array antennas 51 and 52 may be of a 4- or 8-element
type as is common for TCAS systems or a 16-element type antenna. Another
reason for introducing random phase modulation is for identifying the
reflected signal. See Column 6, lines 26-36: [0020] The phase shift is
inserted pulse-by-pulse, and the pulse-position modulation with phase
shifting is synthesized digitally at the I/Q baseband and up-converted to
1090 MHz carrier frequency. In the embodiment shown, a 180.degree. phase
shift is added pulse-by-pulse in a random manner. In addition, the random
phase shift code is put in memory during each message transmission. When
reflected pulses are received, the system will try to match the amplitude
and phase changes from pulse to pulse in a pulse-compression or matched
filtering process, as discussed below in further detail. There is a
weakness in Zahn's system when the target is an Adversary. The Adversary
can receive Zahn's signal, see that the phase of the bits is being
changed, and know that Zahn is using his ADS-B Radar. The Adversary will
have to assume he has been detected and has lost the element of surprise.
As a result, Zahn has also lost an element of surprise because there is
value in detecting an Adversary who does not know he has been detected.
The invention of the current inventor teaches such a system.
[0021] In European Patent Application EP2136222 Validity check of vehicle
position information published Dec. 23, 2009 (Persson, et al.) [IDS Cite
7] ADS-B is not used as a radar. Instead, Persson assumes that the target
is broadcasting ADS-B signals. The direction to the target is determined
using a directional antenna. The range to the target is determined when
the target is sending a proper time-synchronized ADS-B signal. If the
target is not broadcasting a valid ADS-B signal then radar must be used.
See page 3, paragraphs 19, 20, and 21.
[0022] U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 20110140950 Validity
check of vehicle position information transmitted over a
time-synchronized data link published Jun. 16, 2011 [IDS Cite 8] contains
the same disclosure as the above European Patent Application EP2136222.
The title makes it clear that the invention requires a time-synchronized
data link. Note that the U.S. Patent Application Publication lists only
Svante Anderson as the inventor. Svante Anderson is listed as a
co-inventor on the European Patent Application.
[0023] Where ADS-B is relied upon to prevent mid-air collisions, an
aircraft that does not have the equipment installed (or ADS-B is broken
or has been deliberately turned off) is a hazard to itself and other
aircraft in the vicinity.
[0024] --Current Practice in Flying UAVs
[0025] The current practice in flying UAVs in civilian airspace is
typified by the report Sensing Requirements for Unmanned Air Vehicles by
AFRL's Air Vehicles Directorate, Control Sciences Division, Systems
Development Branch, Wright-Patterson AFB OH, June 2004, which relies on
computer-intelligence to use sensors to sense and avoid other aircraft.
[IDS Cite 9]
[0026] According to the presentation entitled Developing Sense & Avoid
Requirements for Meeting an Equivalent Level of Safety given by Russ
Wolfe, Technology IPT Lead, Access 5 Project at UVS Tech 2006 this had
not changed as of Jan. 18, 2006. [IDS Cite 10] Access 5 was a national
project sponsored by NASA and Industry with participation by the FAA and
DOD to introduce high altitude long endurance (HALE) remotely operated
aircraft (ROA) to routine flights in the National Airspace System (NAS).
Access 5 started in May 2004 but when NASA withdrew its support (and
funding) the Industry members decided not to spend their own money and
Access 5 was dissolved at the end of 2005.
[0027] The presentation Integration into the National Airspace System
(NAS) given by John Timmerman of the FAA's Air Traffic Organization (Jul.
12, 2005) essentially says that under current UAS Operations in the NAS
UAVs should not harm other aircraft or the public. (Page 3: "While
ensuring `no harm` to other NAS customers and public") [IDS Cite 11]
[0028] The article Zone Ready for Drone, Apr. 7, 2006, on the web site for
the FAA's Air Traffic Organization Employees states that [IDS Cite 12],
[0029] Since March 29, a temporary flight restriction . . . has limited
access to the airspace along almost 350 miles of the border, expanding an
earlier TFR near Nogales. The restriction is in effect nightly from 6
p.m. to 9 a.m., although that time can be expanded by issuance of a
Notice to Airmen. Aircraft wishing to fly in the TFR when it is active
must receive authorization from air traffic control prior to entry. Once
in, pilots are required to maintain two-way communication with ATC and
transmit a discrete transponder code. The reason for the TFR is to enable
Predator UAVs to patrol the border. The article quotes Stephen Glowacki,
a Systems Safety and Procedures specialist with the FAA's Air Traffic
Organization as saying: [0030] This is an extreme situation that has been
presented to us," states Stephen Glowacki, a Systems Safety and
Procedures specialist with the FAA's Air Traffic Organization, stressing
the nation's security. "We have been working with U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to try and answer this situation." [0031] Inserting UASs into
the National Airspace System is not a simple feat. According to Glowacki,
the technology and certification that will permit unmanned aircraft to
"see and avoid" other air traffic is still eight to ten years away. In
the mean time, a carefully controlled environment is needed.
[0032] From Quadrennial Roles and Missions Review Report, Department of
Defense, January 2009, page 29 [IDS Cite 13]: [0033] U.S. Joint Forces
Command Joint UAS Center of Excellence has identified three areas
necessary to ensure access to applicable classes of the National Airspace
System: (1) Airworthiness Certification; (2) establishment of
standardized basic UAS qualifications consistent with Federal Aviation
Administration guidelines for each class of airspace; and (3) development
of sense and avoid technology. Working with the Services, the U.S. Joint
Forces Command Joint UAS Center of Excellence will ensure these areas are
addressed during UAS development. (Emphasis added.)
OBJECTIVES
[0034] Therefore, an objective of the present invention is to improve the
ADS-B system by using ADS-B as a radar system for sensing aircraft and
other objects so that aircraft equipped with ADS-B can detect target
aircraft not equipped with ADS-B, or the target aircraft's ADS-B is
broken or has been deliberately turned off, or a false ADS-B signal is
being emitted.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0035] Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) can be improved
by using the signal transmitted from an ADS-B unit as a radar transmitter
with the ADS-B receiver used to receive reflections. In a first preferred
embodiment a standard omni-directional antenna is used to receive the
reflections of the ADS-B signal. The time delays between the transmitted
signal and the reflections are used to determine the range of other
aircraft and match the range and number of targets to the ADS-B signals
normally received. Doppler analysis can be used to confirm the speeds of
the targets. The integrity of a reflected signal is determined by
comparing the datastream of the reflected signal with the datastream of
the transmitted signal. If more than one such reflected signal is
received by the ADS-B receiver then the closest reflected signal is a
true target and the other reflected signals are either from additional
aircraft farther away or are being caused by an unfriendly target
transmitting a delayed version of the reflected signal. In order for an
adversary target aircraft to produce a false signal corresponding to a
range that is closer than its true position it would have to exactly
predict the datastreams being transmitted. The ADS-B messages transmitted
in the datastream contain items such as [0036] Aircraft identification
[0037] Absolute bearing/2D distance [0038] Heading/Tracking [0039] Wake
vortex category [0040] Relative altitude/Absolute altitude [0041] Ground
speed [0042] Vertical velocity See Automatic Dependent Surveillance
Broadcast (ADS-B) Surveillance Development for Air Traffic Management
[IDS Cite 14, PDF page 5].
[0043] A more detailed description can be found in Exploiting the
Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast System Via False Target
Injection; Thesis by Domenic Magazu III, Captain, USAF [IDS Cite 15, PDF
pages 49-54].
[0044] It is unlikely that all of these parameters can be predicted
exactly. However, if an aircraft using ADS-B as a radar has reason to
believe it is receiving false reflected signals it can randomly vary its
transmission times.
[0045] By using the ADS-B datastream to determine the integrity of
reflected signals, there is no difference in the transmitted signal
between the ADS-B radar system and an ADS-B system that does not use the
transmitted signal for radar. An adversary target will have no way of
knowing if he has been detected. The user of the ADS-B radar can use the
tactic of acting as though he has not detected the adversary target. At
some point the tactic can change, such as by shooting down the adversary
target.
[0046] In a second preferred embodiment a directional receive antenna is
used to give both the range and bearing to aircraft and other objects in
the vicinity of the user's aircraft even when other aircraft are not
equipped with ADS-B.
[0047] The use of a directional antenna requires the ability to aim the
antenna. This can be done by physically aiming the antennas (such as when
the antenna uses a parabolic dish reflector) or by using an active
electronically scanned array. Because each area must be separately
scanned the time to detect and locate targets is increased according to
the directionality of the antenna. The use of a directional antenna
reduces the radio frequency noise received that is produced by the Sun,
except when the antenna is pointed at the Sun. (The level of the sun's
contribution depends on the solar flux.) It also reduces the noise
received that is produced by the Earth (about 290K.), except when the
antenna is pointed at the Earth.
[0048] Again, by using the ADS-B datastream to determine the integrity of
reflected signals, there is no difference in the transmitted signal
between the ADS-B radar system and an ADS-B system that does not use the
transmitted signal for radar. An adversary target will have no way of
knowing if he has been detected. The user of the ADS-B radar can use the
tactic of acting as though he has not detected the adversary target. At
some point the tactic can change, such as by shooting down the adversary
target.
[0049] In a third preferred embodiment a separate receiver is used with
the directional antenna to make it possible to receive and process radar
returns without the risk of missing ADS-B messages from other aircraft.
[0050] There is a possible issue when the target is close enough that the
ADS-B message is still being sent when the beginning of the reflected
signal has started coming back. The ADS-B message using the 1090 ES Data
Link is 120 us long. See FIG. 4. At the speed of light (186,300
miles/sec) this corresponds to approximately 22.4 miles. Since this
includes the trip to the target and back again it means a range to the
target of approximately 11.2 miles. However, because of causality we know
that the end of the reflected ADS-B message must happen after the end of
the transmitted ADS-B message. The transmitted signal and the received
reflection signal will overlap but cannot overlap completely. The
question is how much of the non-overlapped reflection signal do we need
in order to verify with good probability that we are receiving our own
reflected ADS-B message and not the ADS-B message from another aircraft.
Again referring to FIG. 4, the ADS-B message ends with 24 bits of CRC
(cyclic redundancy check) which is an error detection and correction code
that allows up to 5 bits in the ADS-B message to be corrected. The
probability that an ADS-B message from another aircraft will have the
same CRC as the User's ADS-B message is very small. The 24-bit CRC code
is 24 us long, which corresponds to a range to the target of
approximately 2.2 miles.
[0051] The use of a directional antenna in the second and third
embodiments makes it even less likely that the signal being received is
from another aircraft so the number of bits required to give a good
probability that the signal being received is a valid reflection can be
decreased, thereby decreasing the minimum range of detection.
[0052] Thus, the datastream comparator can be configured so that it does
not need to compare the complete ADS-B message in order to verify with
good probability that the signal being received is a reflection and not
another aircraft's ADS-B signal.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0053] The invention may best be understood by referring to the following
description and accompanying drawings which illustrate the invention. In
the drawings:
[0054] FIG. 1 is a general illustration showing an ADS-B system used as a
radar, using omni-directional antennas.
[0055] FIG. 2 is a general illustration showing an ADS-B system used as a
radar, using a separate directional receiving antenna.
[0056] FIG. 3 is a general illustration showing an ADS-B system used as a
radar, using a separate directional receiving antenna and a separate
receiver.
[0057] FIG. 4 is a reproduction of FIG. 2 from Security of ADS-B: State of
the Art and Beyond by Strohmeier, Lenders, and Martinovic (IDS cite 16)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0058] In the following description, numerous specific details are set
forth to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it
is understood that the invention may be practiced without these specific
details. In other instances well-known circuits, structures, and
techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the
invention.
[0059] FIG. 1 is a general illustration showing an ADS-B system used as a
radar, using omni-directional antennas. ADS-B Transmitter 103
periodically transmits a message containing the present aircraft's unique
ID, GPS coordinates, and other data using Omni-Directional antenna 101.
When ADS-B Transmitter 103 is not transmitting, ADS-B Receiver 104 is
listening for messages transmitted by other aircraft containing their
unique ID, GPS coordinates, and other data. An Antenna Multiplexer
(Antenna Mux 102) is used to route the signals from Omni-Directional
Antenna 101 to ADS-B Transmitter 103 and ADS-B Receiver 104.
Omni-Directional Antenna 106 is used with GPS Receiver 107 to provide the
GPS coordinates of the present aircraft. All of this is controlled by
ADS-B Processor 105.
[0060] ADS-B operation is improved by using the signal produced by ADS-B
Transmitter 103 as a radar with reflected signals received by ADS-B
Receiver 104 under the control of ADS-B Processor 105 and Radar Processor
108.
[0061] Datastream Comparator 109 determines the integrity of a reflected
signal by comparing the datastream of the reflected signal with the
datastream of the transmitted signal.
[0062] If the number and range of targets reported by radar do not match
the number and range of aircraft reported by ADS-B then there is an
aircraft out there that does not have ADS-B, it is broken or has been
disabled, or there is a false ADS-B signal present.
[0063] The results are displayed on Display 110.
[0064] Datastream Comparator 109 may be combined with Radar Processor 108.
Radar Processor 108 may be combined with ADS-B Processor 105.
[0065] In FIG. 2, a separate directional antenna (Directional Antenna 201)
is selected by Antenna Mux 205 to receive the reflected signals. The
advantage of using a separate antenna for this function is that it is
directional, as opposed to Omni-Directional Antenna 101. Directional
Antenna 201 can also be used by ADS-B Transmitter 103 in order to
strengthen radar returns from a specific target or to increase the range
of the system in a specific direction.
[0066] Directional Antenna 201 is controlled by Antenna Controller 202
under the direction of Radar Processor 203 which also controls the radar
function through ADS-B Processor 105. Directional Antenna 201 and Antenna
Controller 202 may be a system that mechanically aims Directional Antenna
201 or the combination may be an electronically scanned array.
[0067] Datastream Comparator 109 determines the integrity of a reflected
signal by comparing the datastream of the reflected signal with the
datastream of the transmitted signal.
[0068] If the number, range, and bearing of targets reported by radar do
not match the number, range, and bearing of aircraft reported by ADS-B
then there is an aircraft out there that does not have ADS-B, it is
broken or has been disabled, or there is a false ADS-B signal present.
[0069] The results are displayed on Display 204.
[0070] Datastream Comparator 109 may be combined with Radar Processor 203.
Radar Processor 203 may be combined with ADS-B Processor 105.
[0071] In FIG. 3, as an alternative to sharing ADS-B Receiver 104,
Directional Antenna 201 can be used with its own receiver. Antenna Mux
301 routes Directional Antenna 201 to Receiver 302 whose output goes to
ADS-B Processor 303 to make it possible to receive and process radar
returns without the risk of missing ADS-B messages from other aircraft.
[0072] The integrity of a reflected signal is determined by comparing the
datastream of the reflected signal with the datastream of the transmitted
signal.
[0073] If the number, range, and bearing of targets reported by radar do
not match the number, range, and bearing of aircraft reported by ADS-B
then there is an aircraft out there that does not have ADS-B, it is
broken or has been disabled, or there is a false ADS-B signal present.
[0074] The results are displayed on Display 204.
[0075] Datastream Comparator 109 may be combined with Radar Processor 203.
Radar Processor 203 may be combined with ADS-B Processor 303.
[0076] While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been
shown, it is to be expressly understood that modifications and changes
may be made thereto.
* * * * *