RULE 37.  FAILURE TO MAKE DISCLOSURE OR COOPERATE IN DISCOVERY; SANCTIONS

 

(a) Motion for Order Compelling Disclosure or Discovery.  A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may apply for an order compelling disclosure or discovery as follows:

 

(1) Appropriate Court.  An application for an order to a party may be made to the court in which the action is pending, or, on matters relating to a deposition, to the court in the district where the deposition is being taken. An application for an order to a deponent who is not a party shall be made to the court in the district where the deposition is being, or is to be, taken.

      [As amended; effective January 1, 2005.]

 

(2) Motion.

 

(A) If a party fails to make a disclosure required by Rule 16.1(a) or 16.2(a), any other party may move to compel disclosure and for appropriate sanctions. The motion must include a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the party not making the disclosure in an effort to secure the disclosure without court action.

      [As amended; effective July 1, 2008.]

 

(B) If a deponent fails to answer a question propounded or submitted under Rules 30 or 31, or a corporation or other entity fails to make a designation under Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a), or a party fails to answer an interrogatory submitted under Rule 33, or if a party, in response to a request for inspection submitted under Rule 34, fails to respond that inspection will be permitted as requested or fails to permit inspection as requested, the discovering party may move for an order compelling an answer, or a designation, or an order compelling inspection in accordance with the request. The motion must include a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the person or party failing to make the discovery in an effort to secure the information or material without court action. When taking a deposition on oral examination, the proponent of the question may complete or adjourn the examination before applying for an order.

      [As amended; effective January 1, 2005.]

 

(3) Evasive or Incomplete Disclosure, Answer or Response.  For purposes of this subdivision an evasive or incomplete disclosure, answer or response is to be treated as a failure to disclose, answer or respond.

      [As amended; effective January 1, 2005.]

 

(4) Expenses and Sanctions.

 

(A) If the motion is granted or if the disclosure or requested discovery is provided after the motion was filed, the court shall, after affording an opportunity to be heard, require the party or deponent whose conduct necessitated the motion or the party or attorney advising such conduct or both of them to pay to the moving party the reasonable expenses incurred in making the motion, including attorney’s fees, unless the court finds that the motion was filed without the movant’s first making a good faith effort to obtain the disclosure or discovery without court action, or that the opposing party’s nondisclosure, response or objection was substantially justified, or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

 

(B) If the motion is denied, the court may enter any protective order authorized under Rule 26(c) and shall, after affording an opportunity to be heard, require the moving party or the attorney filing the motion or both of them to pay to the party or deponent who opposed the motion the reasonable expenses incurred in opposing the motion, including attorney’s fees, unless the court finds that the making of the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

 

(C) If the motion is granted in part and denied in part, the court may enter any protective order authorized under Rule 26(c) and may, after affording an opportunity to be heard, apportion the reasonable expenses incurred in relation to the motion among the parties and persons in a just manner.

      [As amended; effective January 1, 2005.]

 

 

(b) Failure to Comply With Order.

 

(1) Sanctions—Deponent.  If a deponent fails to be sworn or to answer a question after being directed to do so by the court the failure may be considered a contempt of court.

 

(2) Sanctions—Party.  If a party or an officer, director, or managing agent of a party or a person designated under Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a) to testify on behalf of a party fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, including an order made under subdivision (a) of this rule or Rule 35, or if a party fails to obey an order entered under Rules 16, 16.1, and 16.2, the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others the following:

      [As amended; effective July 1, 2008.]

 

(A) An order that the matters regarding which the order was made or any other designated facts shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order;

 

(B) An order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses, or prohibiting that party from introducing designated matters in evidence;

 

(C) An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party;

 

(D) In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, an order treating as a contempt of court the failure to obey any orders except an order to submit to a physical or mental examination;

 

(E) Where a party has failed to comply with an order under Rule 35(a) requiring that party to produce another for examination, such orders as are listed in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of this subdivision, unless the party failing to comply shows that that party is unable to produce such person for examination.

 

In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party failing to obey the order or the attorney advising that party or both to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

      [As amended; effective January 1, 2005.]

 

 

(c) Failure to Disclose; False or Misleading Disclosure; Refusal to Admit.

 

(1) A party that without substantial justification fails to disclose information required by Rule 16.1, 16.2, or 26(e)(1), or to amend a prior response to discovery as required by Rule 26(e)(2), is not, unless such failure is harmless, permitted to use as evidence at a trial, at a hearing, or on a motion any witness or information not so disclosed. In addition to or in lieu of this sanction, the court, on motion and after affording an opportunity to be heard, may impose other appropriate sanctions. In addition to requiring payment of reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the failure, these sanctions may include any of the actions authorized under Rule 37(b)(2)(A), (B), and (C) and may include informing the jury of the failure to make the disclosure.

      [As amended; effective July 1, 2008.]

 

(2) If a party fails to admit the genuineness of any document or the truth of any matter as requested under Rule 36, and if the party requesting the admissions thereafter proves the genuineness of the document or the truth of the matter, the requesting party may apply to the court for an order requiring the other party to pay the reasonable expenses incurred in making that proof, including reasonable attorney’s fees. The court shall make the order unless it finds that (A) the request was held objectionable pursuant to Rule 36(a), or (B) the admission sought was of no substantial importance, or (C) the party failing to admit had reasonable ground to believe that the party might prevail on the matter, or (D) there was other good reason for the failure to admit.

      [As amended; effective January 1, 2005.]

 

 

(d) Failure of Party to Attend at Own Deposition or Serve Answers to Interrogatories or Respond to Request for Inspection.  If a party or an officer, director, or managing agent of a party or a person designated under Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a) to testify on behalf of a party fails (1) to appear before the officer who is to take the deposition, after being served with a proper notice, or (2) to serve answers or objections to interrogatories submitted under Rule 33, after proper service of the interrogatories, or (3) to serve a written response to a request for inspection submitted under Rule 34, after proper service of the request, the court in which the action is pending on motion may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others it may take any action authorized under subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of subdivision (b)(2) of this rule. Any motion specifying a failure under clause (2) or (3) of this subdivision shall include a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the party failing to answer or respond in an effort to obtain such answer or response without court action. In lieu of any order or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party failing to act or the attorney advising that party or both to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

 

The failure to act described in this subdivision may not be excused on the ground that the discovery sought is objectionable unless the party failing to act has applied for a protective order as provided by Rule 26(c).

      [As amended; effective January 1, 2005.]

 

 

(e) Reserved.

 

(f) Failure to Participate in the Framing of a Discovery Plan.  If a party or a party’s attorney fails to participate in good faith in the development and submission of a proposed discovery plan as required by Rule 16.1(b)(2) or 16.2, the court may, after opportunity for hearing, require such party or party’s attorney to pay to any other party the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the failure.

      [As amended; effective July 1, 2008.]

Drafter’s Note

2004 Amendment

 

    Subdivision (a) is amended to conform to the federal rule, as amended in 1993. The amendments reflect the changes to Rule 16.1(a), requiring disclosure of matters without a discovery request. New paragraph (2)(A) provides for a motion to compel disclosures required by revised Rule 16.1(a) and requires a meet-and-confer or a good faith attempt to meet and confer before seeking court intervention. The language of former paragraph (2), except the last sentence of the former paragraph, is retained in paragraph (2)(B) with the addition of a meet-and-confer requirement that is identical to paragraph (2)(A). Paragraph (3) is amended to apply to disclosures under Rule 16.1(a) and responses to discovery. Paragraph (4) is divided into three subparagraphs consistent with the federal rule and in each provision the phrase “after opportunity for hearing” is changed to “after affording an opportunity to be heard” to clarify that the court may consider sanctions on written submissions as well as on oral hearings. Subparagraph (A) is amended to address the situation where the withheld information is produced after the motion is filed but before it is heard and to provide that the moving party is not entitled to an award for its expenses if a meet-and-confer could have prevented the need for a motion. Subparagraph (C) is amended to include the provision that was included as the last sentence of former subdivision (a)(2).

 

    The amendments to subdivision (b) are technical except that the reference to Rule 26(f) in paragraph (2) is changed to Rules 16 and 16.1 consistent with amendments to those rules.

 

    Subdivision (c) is amended to conform to the 1993 and 2000 amendments to the federal rule. New paragraph (1) sets forth sanctions for failing to make disclosures required by Rules 16.1 and 26(e)(1). The language of former subdivision (c) is retained in paragraph (2) with technical amendments.

 

    Subdivision (e) is retained as a reserved provision for future amendments.

 

    Subdivision (f) corresponds to subdivision (g) of the federal rule. It is amended to conform to the revision of Rules 26(f) and 16.1(b)(2).