600 P.2d 237 (1979)
Supreme Court of Nevada.
September 27, 1979.
Kenneth J. Jordan, Carson City, for appellants.
Stokes, Shaw, Heaton & Doescher, Carson City, for respondents.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs' counsel had default entered and later secured a default judgment against defendants without notice to their counsel who had requested additional time within which to file an answer. Such advantage should not have been taken without first inquiring about defense counsel's intention to proceed. Supreme Court Rule 187;[1] Nevada Ind. Guaranty v. Sturgeon, 238*238 80 Nev. 254, 391 P.2d 862 (1964), concurring opinion. Accordingly, we annul the judgment entered below and remand for further proceedings.
MOWBRAY, C.J., and THOMPSON, GUNDERSON and MANOUKIAN, JJ., and GREGORY,[2] District Judge (Ret.), concur.
[1] SCR 187: "A member of the state bar ... [w]hen he knows the identity of a lawyer representing an opposing party, ... should not take advantage of the lawyer by causing any default or dismissal to be entered without first inquiring about the opposing lawyer's intention to proceed."
[2] The Chief Justice designated Hon. Frank B. Gregory, Senior Judge, to sit in this case in place of the Hon. Cameron Batjer, Justice, who was disqualified. Nev.Const. art. 6, § 19; SCR 10.